Dave’s (Poignant) Guide to PHP
I wish I had bookmarked a blog entry I read this morning on how PHP is a dead language for everyone except $7.95/mo web hosts. I certainly don’t see that as the case, but I may be biased being a PHP developer with an overly full workload who knows a bunch of people who like and use PHP. I’ve given some thought to the future of PHP, though, and I have to agree it’s on the way out, but only in the same sense that Java is on the way out.
Java is still out there, and I get tons of calls & emails from recruiters every week looking to fill Java positions (even though I haven’t updated my online resume in over a year). Java positions tend to pay well, and are usually with big, dependable companies. They’re safe, but probably not very “fun”. Very few new open source projects are written in Java — that’s not where the action is anymore. Likewise, PHP started out as a hobbyist thing but grew into a language used by Google, Yahoo!, and other big names on the Internet. PHP is where Java was a year or two ago. Python is where PHP was a year or two ago, and Ruby is where Python was back then.
With one company (Zend) dominating the community like they do, and with big companies using it, PHP seems to have become kinda “corporate”. Remember when your favorite band signed with a big label? PHP kind of did that. The indie fans who dug its original sound and obscurity have moved on to other cool & obscure languages. The sound changed, man. It used to be about the music, man, but now it’s all about writing songs for yuppies to listen to while they drink their lattes in their BMWs!
Ok, this metaphor is getting out of hand. But, you get where I’m going with this, right?
Ruby and Haskell are the big “indie” programming languages these days. The 20% kind of programmers see them pushing the boundaries and breaking us out of the C++/Java influenced paradigms which have dominated for more than a decade. They’re the programming languages of rebels…digital Che Guevara t-shirts, if you will.
Know what else they’ve got? Why the Lucky Stiff.
Why’s (Poignant) Guide to Ruby is a programming book, the likes of which I haven’t seen since Mr. Bunny’s Big Cup o’ Java back in ’99. It teaches the basics of Ruby programming through surreal cartoons, personal anecdotes (usually not about programming), and code examples. It’s fun, it’s catchy (chunky bacon!), and it’s unlike any book I’ve seen the PHP community produce. It’s even published online with a Creative Commons license, for that extra bit of indie cred.
Think what you will of a programming book written in this style, but you have to admit that it’s “out there”. It’s different, and that makes it attractive. PHP doesn’t have Why the Lucky Stiff. We have Zend. And, while I’m sure the Zend crew knows how to party, their website doesn’t reflect it. When you’re pushing a $250/seat IDE, it has to look attractive to the kind of people who cut checks to order $250/seat IDEs, not the kind of people who stay up into the wee hours of the morning learning new programming languages.
I’m not saying we should go out and steal this idea, but maybe ask ourselves why the PHP community doesn’t have a Why, and what might prevent us from having one in the future. If the answer involves the words “management”, “corporate”, or “inappropriate”, we’re doomed. Now that PHP 5.x is coming into it’s own, attention will be focussed on PHP 6.x for a glimpse of what the future holds. If PHP is to remain popular among the passionate programmers out there, it needs to catch up feature-wise. I, for one, dislike writing complex apps in a language that doesn’t have namespaces. It also needs to start pushing boundaries.
If PHP “sells out”, it wont mean the immediate death of the language, community, or even the job market — Java has proven that. But it will start it on the path of decline, and once you’re on that path it’s hard to get off it. We need to make PHP fun again. PHP needs chunky bacon.
December 2nd, 2007 at 11:20 pm
PHP is the Microsoft Excel of programming languages. Move on already.
December 2nd, 2007 at 11:58 pm
You aren’t too far off there. PHP 5 came out back in 2004 and it’s just getting adopted on a large scale because the folks behind PHP finally said “enough”. There are a lot of people out there who understand how to write procedural PHP 4 code and don’t want to learn anything new. PHP 5, with its exceptions and public/private variables, is too complicated for some of them.
PHP got to be where it is because it’s easy to learn. This is the niche PHP seems destined to fill. It’s a shame, though, because it could be so much more. I have to wonder if PHP 6 will ever make it out the gate, or if it’ll face too much resistance.
December 3rd, 2007 at 2:50 am
PHP doesn’t have a _why mostly because it’s never needed one. Unlike with Ruby (and a lot of other languages), no one has ever said, “Gee, I’d like to learn PHP, but I just can’t find any decent documentation.”
You can learn pretty much everything you need to know about PHP — and easily, too — without ever leaving php.net. The same is not true for many other languages.
I also don’t think being “too corporate” is something most people care about. It never stopped anyone from using VB or C#.
December 14th, 2007 at 10:12 am
In the real estate industry it’s all about location, location, location.
In the computer industry it’s all about adoption, adoption, adoption.
PHP is big and will continue to be, but let’s face it new technologies always rise up over time on the adoption scale. The cool thing about it all is how well other technologies can be combined in the internet world without necessarily rendering a well adopted tool useless.